\centerline{{\bf Notes to Table 2}}
\vskip 0.4in
\par \noindent 514-012 = N7263 : observed on CGCG position, as given.
\par \noindent U12008 : pointing and flux calibration uncertain.
\par \noindent 514-020 = U12012 : pair with -019 at 3.9', 211; no
 evidence of blend.
\par \noindent 514-039 = U12051 : highly asymm, poor s/n; vel, width, flux
 uncertain.
\par \noindent 514-071 = U12120 = N7342 : as above.
\par \noindent 514-090 = U12137 : flux calibration uncertain.
\par \noindent 516-002 = U12474 : signal identification uncertain; signal
 could be much broader ($\sim 650$ km/s), and centered near 4900 km/s.
\par \noindent 517-014 : 80 mJy continuum source within beam; absorption
 feature probably real (no obvious optical feature in off position at
 $00^h05^m23^s$, same dec; check for HI emission in off field not done).
\par \noindent 519-007 : interference makes signal identification quite
 doubtful.
\par \noindent 519-021 = U480 : probable blend with -022 at 1.4'.
\par \noindent 520-023 = U755 : poor flux calibration.
\par \noindent 520-026 = U758 : as above.
\par \noindent 520-036 = U831 : as above.
\par \noindent 521-017 : confused with -018 at 2.5'; parms. v. uncertain.
\par \noindent 521-018 = U944 = N512 : at 2.5' from -017; no evidence of
 disturbance in this spectrum.
\par \noindent U1316 : pair with 522-023 at 1.5'.
\par \noindent 522-071 = U1400 : parms. v. uncertain; other candidate for
 signal at $\sim 4025$ km/s.
\par \noindent U1642b : in spectrum on U1642, two well separate features
 appear; we attribute that at 4639 km/s to U1642 because of its symmetry
 and resemblance of rotating disk; other feature might be associated with
 extended emission from one of the companions of U1642, located respectively
 at 4.3' and 3.8'.
\par \noindent 523-067 = U2067 : pair with -066 at 2.5'; blend; parms.
 quite uncertain.
\par \noindent 524-043 = U2465 : asymm. profile: poor pointing?
\par \noindent 524-055 = U2548 : poor flux calibration.
\par \noindent U2707 : previously reported velocity (Beers et al. 1986)
 of 3405 km/s is incorrect.
\par \noindent U2886 : both U2886 and U2887 (1.1x1.0, dwarf, m=18) within
 the beam (sep. 1'); unable to discern two separate features, assignment
 of full flux to U2886 arbitrary.

\end
